Fowarding to the list -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:47:13 +0200 From: Endre Karlson <endre.karlson at gmail.com> To: gkotton at redhat.com Why not just --public or not ? Why do you need --public True ? That just adds confusion... Endre. 2012/7/12 Gary Kotton <gkotton at redhat.com <mailto:gkotton at redhat.com>> Hi, 1. Is this also applicable to the agents? Say for example a user wants to ensure that a public network is attached to network interface em1 and the private network attached to em2. Is this something that will be addressed by the blueprint? 2. I prefer option #3. This seems to be a cleaner approach for the user interface. Thanks Gary On 07/12/2012 01:52 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > Hi, > > A proposal for the implementation of the public networks feature > has been published. > It can be reached from the quantum-v2-public-networks blueprint > page [1]. > Feedback is more than welcome! > > Regards, > Salvatore > > [1]: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-v2-public-networks > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list:https://launchpad.net/~openstack <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack> > Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net > <mailto:openstack at lists.launchpad.net> Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~openstack > <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack> More help : > https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack> Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net <mailto:openstack at lists.launchpad.net> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120712/4ab94ba5/attachment.html>