[Openstack] A possible alternative to Gerrit ...

Josh Kearney josh at jk0.org
Wed Sep 7 16:14:59 UTC 2011


On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell
> <kevin.mitchell at rackspace.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 11:24 -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
> >> In addition, this doesn't prevent anyone on the core team from doing a
> >> straight close and merge of the pull request into trunk, potentially
> >> breaking trunk.
> >
> > So far as I know, there's no requirement that someone have merge
> > authority on a project in order to comment on pull requests.  Do cores
> > have direct access to the openstack repos right now, and if they do,
> > what's to stop them from merging pull requests into trunk?
>
> No. Gerrit and Jenkins own the canonical repos, and that's the whole point.
>
> >  I think
> > cores are smart enough to follow the procedures laid down, and if they
> > can't, well, they need to not be cores.
>
> I repeat my previous statement about humans being poor gatekeepers
> compared to automated enforceable policies.
>
> -jay
>

Could make the default branch on github 'develop' so all Pull Requests would
default to there, and let Hubcap/RoundAbout be the gatekeeper of master?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20110907/3acf6df8/attachment.html>


More information about the Openstack mailing list