[Openstack] Fwd: help wanted: porting sqlalchemy-migrate for SQLAlchemy 0.7 and sqlalchemy-migrate maintenance

Jay Pipes jaypipes at gmail.com
Fri May 27 14:02:51 UTC 2011


FYI, this has implications for both Nova and Glance.

Our relevant bug on Launchpad for this is here:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/787296

Ta,
-jay


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jan Dittberner <jan.dittberner at googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:41 AM
Subject: help wanted: porting sqlalchemy-migrate for SQLAlchemy 0.7
and sqlalchemy-migrate maintenance
To: sqlalchemy at googlegroups.com
Cc: migrate-users at googlegroups.com, migrate-announce at googlegroups.com


Hello,

I work on making sqlalchemy-migrate [1] work with SQLAlchemy 0.7. I
fixed all broken unit tests except for one related to adding a new
column with a foreign key to an existing table. We have a continues
integration system (Jenkins CI) at [2] that provides the output of the
failing test. The problem is with some changed behaviour of the
SchemaVisitor API (or the Column objects). Until SQLAlchemy 0.6 it was
possible to get the constraints object for the ForeignKey arguments of
a column. The test at [3] creates a new Column instance and adds it to
the table. Afterwards our ANSIColumnGenerator [4] is triggered to
generate the necessary SQL statements. Until SQLAlchemy 0.6 the code
for generating the foreign key constraints could be generated properly
but now the constraint is None instead of a ForeignKeyConstraint. I
tried to just ignore fk.constraint if it is None, which expectedly did
not generate a statement. I also tried to construct a
ForeignKeyConstraint instance and pass that to the AddConstraint
constructor. This approach added a second ForeignKey instance to the
Column which is not desired too.

Can you please give me hints in the right direction or provide help to
fix this issue?

We would also like to invite interested developers to join the
sqlalchemy-migrate project because it has no maintainers with enough
time to keep it in a good shape. I think it would be great if the test
coverage and code quality would be improved but neither me nor the
other current maintainers have enough time to do these necessary
prerequisites. We have a quite long list of outstanding issues [5]
that need some triaging and fixes and should give a good start for
interested developers.

[1] http://code.google.com/p/sqlalchemy-migrate/
[2] http://jenkins.gnuviech-server.de/job/sqlalchemy-migrate-all/
[3] http://code.google.com/p/sqlalchemy-migrate/source/browse/migrate/tests/changeset/test_changeset.py#160
[4] http://code.google.com/p/sqlalchemy-migrate/source/browse/migrate/changeset/ansisql.py#87
[5] http://code.google.com/p/sqlalchemy-migrate/issues/list


Regards
Jan Dittberner

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "migrate-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to migrate-users at googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
migrate-users+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/migrate-users?hl=en.




More information about the Openstack mailing list