Open Stack

Describing full Volume API as an extension may work in the short term.  Long term though we're moving towards having a suite of APIs.  From this perspective adding an extension to OpenStack Compute API seems a little strange to me.  But it could work short term, my concern is that we should really be thinking of Volumes as a core API, not additional features to Compute. Certainly we may need to extend compute to do things like mount/unmount a volume.

-jOrGe W.


On Mar 22, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Justin Santa Barbara
> <justin at fathomdb.com> wrote:
>> So: When can we expect volume support in nova?  If I repackaged my volumes
>> API as an extension, can we get it merged into Cactus?
> 
> I would personally support this.
> 
> Wasn't one of the ideas of the extensions API to provide a bit of a
> playground for features to bake that, at some future time, be made a
> core resource endpoint in the OpenStack API? This would be a perfect
> example of that, no?
> 
> -jay
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp