[Openstack] OS API server password generation
dan.prince at rackspace.com
Mon Mar 7 15:43:27 UTC 2011
Appoligies for the late blueprint submission. I guess I like using Blueprints for missing features so that I can setup the dependencies in launchpad. On this specific issue I just wanted some community comments and communication on the notes I had in etherpad. Although my initial email was poorly worded I did get a couple useful comments.
Bugs vs. Blueprints is sort of a gray area. When a larger blue print is accepted (like the Openstack 1.1 API) should we file component features as bugs or blueprints?
In my case I could have easily considered this a bug as well since we should already support the v1.0 API right?
From: "Thierry Carrez" <thierry at openstack.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 5, 2011 4:14pm
To: openstack at lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OS API server password generation
Jay Pipes wrote:
> Does anyone else feel it's a bit late to be targeting new blueprints
> for Cactus since we're 2 weeks from branch merge proposal freeze?
SpecSubmissionDeadline for Cactus was one month ago. It was tolerated so
far to add simple blueprints that are fairly obvious and do not require
discussion (even retrospectively). But if the added specs require design
discussion and consensus, it's clearly too late: at this stage in the
cycle we should be busy pumping code out and reviewing proposed code
branches, not really participating in long design threads...
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Release Manager, OpenStack
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
More information about the Openstack