Open Stack

If more documentation enables deployers to properly deploy Nova, it's
in scope. At least, that's my opinion.

-jay

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Andy Smith <andyster at gmail.com> wrote:
> My understanding is that the paste.deploy config is unrelated to the flags
> system and is rather separate in scope.
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Armando Migliaccio
>> <Armando.Migliaccio at eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> > I have noticed that recently a new way of configuring nova-api has been
>> > introduced. It seems that the old gflags style has been replaced in
>> > favour
>> > of paste.deploy style.
>> >
>> > I am trying to find information about this transition, and how old
>> > config
>> > files can be translated to new ones. Do we just past the flags under the
>> > [DEFAULT] section? I am also wondering if this is going to be done for
>> > other
>> > services other than nova-api.
>> >
>> > This blueprint does not seem to have a lot of information.
>>
>> Hey Todd and Anne,
>>
>> Think we can add a bit of documentation about this?  Armando, can you
>> file a bug so that we can track the documentation needs?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> jay
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>