[Openstack] Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?

Brian Schott bfschott at gmail.com
Fri Feb 11 19:18:05 UTC 2011


Absolutely.  We would like to debate a few additional columns, but yes this is the right blueprint to work from. 


Brian Schott
bfschott at gmail.com

On Feb 11, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Ken Pepple wrote:

> On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Brian Schott wrote:
>> Right now, we're switching on the label, which is I think is a bad idea.  I need to capture this in a blueprint for Diablo, but what we're proposing is to expand the instance_types dictionary to include additional fields and possibly turn it into a full editable table so that openstack deployments can advertise additional capabilities as new instance_types beyond the Amazon defaults.
> Some of this is already in flight (http://wiki.openstack.org/ConfigureInstanceTypesDynamically) … can you take a look at this and see if this could be extended to what you want ?
> /k
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

More information about the Openstack mailing list