Open Stack

On 09/03/2010 06:52 AM, Joshua McKenty wrote:
> The next step is definitely to write up blueprints of these planned features
> (something that I am long overdue to contribute as well).
> 
> I believe we have already had some discussions with RedHat about getting
> Fedora Core packages of OpenStack made, I can follow up on this.
> 

We have some fedora devs working on RPM's for us. So those should be
available soon, I'll ping them to find out their status.  This should
not be a major effort, since we already have Ubuntu packages, in the
worst case we could use Alien to convert them.


> We will publish a more complete feature list for Austin by the 3rd (e.g.,
> today!) by completing the missing blueprints.

This is absolutely correct.  The targeted feature list will be generated
using the blueprints and updated through the process. Next Tuesday we
have a technical writer joining the project, Anne Gentle, who will help
us have much more acceptable documentation.


We will be changing the meeting day to Tuesday in the future.  I will do
my best to find a good time for everyone, but we may end up rotating
times so that people in Asia and Australia can more easily participate.

I will send an email about the meeting today and blueprints out a little
later today.

Cheers,
Rick

> Joshua
> 
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Masanori ITOH <itoumsn at nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm Masanori Itoh of NTT DATA, Japan.
>>
>> I would like to share some issues on openstack from Japanese
>> enterprise system market.
>>
>> I know that the requirements below do not fit for the austin release
>> scheduled in this Octorber, but I believe that still it's useful
>> sharing them with folks here.
>>
>>
>> Issue 1. Live Migration support (strong)
>>
>>  From a view point of operating private clouds which host enterprise
>>  systems, Live Migration is almost mandatory.
>>
>>  Now, we are doing feasibility study to explore if we can do and
>>  contribute that.
>>
>> Issue 2. RPM packages (medium)
>>
>>  In Japanese business market, RPM based distributions such as RHEL are
>>  dominant.  So, we would like to have RPM packages too in addition to
>>  deb packages.
>>  As for the initial target distribution, Fedora 13 would be appropriate
>>  I think, and I guess that it's possible we contribute somehow from
>>  this point too.
>>
>> Issue 3. Feature list of the austin release
>>
>>  My boss asked me if there is a detailed list of features
>>  covered by the austin release.
>>  For example, the list is preferable to have coverage list of
>>  the Amazon API and Rackspace API which Nova supports.
>>
>>  Is there that kind of list?
>>   # I'm afraid no... :(
>>
>>
>> BTW, cloud anyone tell me what I should do next?
>>
>> - Opening blueprint pages?
>>
>> - Joining the next release IRC?
>>  - Please understand that the weekly release meeting is 5:00AM of Saturday
>>    in Japan unfortunatelly ... :(
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Masanori
>>
>> ---
>> Masanori ITOH  R&D Headquarters, NTT DATA CORPORATION
>>               e-mail: itoumsn at nttdata.co.jp
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20100903/9127b736/attachment.sig>