[Openstack-track-chairs] Guidance on Vendor Specific Presentations?
Dave Neary
dneary at redhat.com
Wed Mar 1 20:52:23 UTC 2017
Hi Jimmy,
We have a question for the Telco & NFV Strategies track - is it 6
presentations, or 5 presentations and 1 alternate, that we are selecting?
Also, I asked about whether there's a possibility of a 2nd lightning
talk slot in a different email - how does that allocation work?
Thanks,
Dave.
On 03/01/2017 11:41 AM, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
> Arkady,
>
> That's not quite right. You have the following selections to make:
>
> 9 sessions + 1 alternate
> 2 lightning talks
>
> You can see how to manage those by watching this video:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8meeot74BXk&t=17s
>
> The numbers are spelled out as (0/10 selections) and (0/2 lightning
> talks selections)
>
> As per my previous email, we're in the middle of tracking a bug, so
> please hold off on setting your final Team selection until that is resolved.
>
> Thanks and let me know if you have further questions.
>
> Jimmy
>
>> Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com <mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
>> March 1, 2017 at 10:28 AM
>>
>> Jimmy,
>>
>> Have the numbers had been loaded in for tracks?
>>
>> Our track made our selection.
>>
>> We choose 3 presentations, 8 lightning talks (2 sessions) and 1
>> alternate lightning talk.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is the tool ready for us to accept these choice?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Arkady
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*Jimmy McArthur [mailto:jimmy at openstack.org]
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 13, 2017 11:25 AM
>> *To:* Kanevsky, Arkady <Arkady_Kanevsky at DELL.com>
>> *Cc:* rubenoz at gmail.com; openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org;
>> James_SaintRossy at comcast.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] Guidance on Vendor Specific
>> Presentations?
>>
>>
>>
>> Arkady,
>>
>> We have not yet decided on final numbers for tracks or lightning
>> talks. Once we have that, the numbers will appear in the Track Chair
>> tool. That's why I've suggested holding off on your selections until
>> after voting :)
>>
>> As far as alternates, yes, we provide options for 1-3 alternates,
>> depending on tracks. That number will also be visible in your
>> selection tool.
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Jimmy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jimmy McArthur <mailto:jimmy at openstack.org>
>> February 13, 2017 at 11:25 AM
>> Arkady,
>>
>> We have not yet decided on final numbers for tracks or lightning
>> talks. Once we have that, the numbers will appear in the Track Chair
>> tool. That's why I've suggested holding off on your selections until
>> after voting :)
>>
>> As far as alternates, yes, we provide options for 1-3 alternates,
>> depending on tracks. That number will also be visible in your
>> selection tool.
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Jimmy
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
>> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>> Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com <mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>
>> February 13, 2017 at 11:16 AM
>>
>> Jimmy,
>>
>> Do we have any guidance on total slots per track?
>>
>> Expect that track chairs have freedom on full presentations, lightning
>> talks and panels as long as they fit into allotted time slots.
>>
>> But want to check.
>>
>>
>>
>> Finally,
>>
>> Do we have one conditional/backup acceptance in case one of the
>> accepted ones fell thru?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Arkady
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*Ruben D. Orduz [mailto:rubenoz at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 13, 2017 11:10 AM
>> *To:* Jimmy McArthur <jimmy at openstack.org>
>> *Cc:* openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org; SaintRossy, James
>> <James_SaintRossy at comcast.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] Guidance on Vendor Specific
>> Presentations?
>>
>>
>>
>> Why is the email step required at all? If it's vendor-heavy or pushing
>> a particular product, give thumbs down and move on.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Jimmy McArthur <jimmy at openstack.org
>> <mailto:jimmy at openstack.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Ruben D. Orduz <mailto:rubenoz at gmail.com>
>> February 13, 2017 at 11:10 AM
>> Why is the email step required at all? If it's vendor-heavy or pushing
>> a particular product, give thumbs down and move on.
>>
>>
>> Jimmy McArthur <mailto:jimmy at openstack.org>
>> February 13, 2017 at 11:07 AM
>> James,
>>
>> If you feel it's specifically a vendor pitch, feel free to send an
>> email to speakersupport at openstack.org and we can review. The
>> Foundation does not support single vendor pitches, and of course, the
>> content cannot be about closed source products.
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Jimmy
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
>> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
More information about the Openstack-track-chairs
mailing list