On Thu, Feb 09 2017, Ruben D. Orduz wrote: > 1) Anonymize proposals in the first review cycle Completely agreed and I find it funny because I already heard several reviewers stating they were checking that proposers "were good speakers" based on previous talks they did. (which I think is a terrible thing to do as nobody is gonna be a good speaker without _starting_ at some point). -- Julien Danjou ;; Free Software hacker ;; https://julien.danjou.info -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 800 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-track-chairs/attachments/20170210/19e1b504/attachment.pgp>