On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org> wrote: > On 17/03/14 09:07, Beth Cohen wrote: > >> Folks - >> We have one that ended up in the Business and strategy track that >> belongs in Storage: >> >> *https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/Show/898 *(Using Numerical >> >> Models of Swift Performance to Build Better and More Cost-Effective >> Systems) >> > > Here's a few from ops track. > > Consider for Apps on OpenStack: > > Application deployment and auto-scaling on OpenShift using Heat 86 > 121 1.41 > > Develop and test on dynamic OpenStack clusters 64 5 0.08 > > > Consider for Business: > > Is OpenStack ready for adoption in the Enterprise? 59 11 > 0.19 > Politics vs. Engineering Balance in Services Migration and Integration 75 > 14 0.19 > Ready for OpenStack? What to Do When You Are and They're Not 86 68 > 0.79 > OpenStack Distributions: Do We Really Need Them? 93 92 > 0.99 > OpenStack Barriers to Enterprise Adoption 79 70 0.89 > > Consider for Compute: > > Massive Scale OpenStack with Brokerless Oslo.Messaging 81 86 > 1.06 > > Although I cannot speak for the other to co-chairs of the Compute track, based on what we discussed we probably want to pass up on this talk. We wanted our track to focus on technologies that are already available to users instead of blueprints that are still in progress [1][2]. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+spec/amqp10-driver-implementation [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75815/ > > Consider for other OSS projects: > Scalable Monitoring as a Service for Operations and Customers 69 61 > 0.88 > > > Regards, > > > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > Openstack-track-chairs mailing list > Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-track-chairs/attachments/20140316/7e6061de/attachment.html>