Open Stack

> On Sep 14, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
> 
> Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sep 14, 2016, at 8:06 AM, Tristan Cacqueray <tdecacqu at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> it has come to my attention that election officials need to be appointed
>>> by the TC. So here is the request to approve the current list:
>>> 
>>>   Tony Breeds (tonyb), tony at bakeyournoodle dot com
>>>   Tristan Cacqueray (tristanC), tdecacqu at redhat dot com
>>>   Nate Johnston (njohnston), openstacknate at gmail dot com
>>> 
>>> We added a third officials to be able to verify Tony's candidacies.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> -Tristan
>> 
>> How have we handled this in the past? A roll-call vote in meeting? An email vote? A resolution?
> 
> In the past we just did not object when volunteers were suggested. I
> think if no TC member formally objects in the coming days we should
> consider those officials good to go.

OK, maybe we should just handle this the same way we do for other teams and have a thread on the -dev list suggesting new members to the team and giving folks a chance to +1/-1 there.

> 
>> Why do we need to re-confirm folks for every election?
> 
> In this precise case there was somebody new added (Nate).

Ah, thanks for volunteering, Nate!

Doug

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/attachments/20160914/a1ebd6dd/attachment.pgp>