[openstack-tc] [User-committee] Adding UC charter to OpenStack Governance
Russell Bryant
rbryant at redhat.com
Thu Jun 2 14:23:13 UTC 2016
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
wrote:
> Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>> The point is more that I think it would mix two sets of unrelated
>> content. Unless we’re talking about separate repositories that are
>> published to a subtree under the governance domain?
>>
>
> Yes, separate repositories published to subtrees.
>
> In fact we already plan to build "governance.openstack.org" from data
> coming out of 2 repositories (openstack/governance and openstack/elections)
> in the near future. Adding a third repository is definitely a possibility.
>
> The way I see it we can have:
>
> - openstack/governance driving the neutral /index.html and /tc/
> - openstack/usercommittee driving /uc/ content
> - openstack/elections driving /elections/ content
>
> each with its own set of approvers. We'd make it clear on the page footer
> which repository the page is built from so that people know where to go to
> propose changes.
>
> We'd keep redirects (or aliases) so that existing deep links to
> /reference/ and /resolutions/ continue to work.
>
> How does that sound ?
>
Sounds good to me.
--
Russell Bryant
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/attachments/20160602/9f554254/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-TC
mailing list