Dear TC members, We'll have a meeting tomorrow at 20:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting, with the following agenda: * Add a "stable:follows-policy" tag [1] * Clarify test-only license requirements [2] * Applying Tacker for Big Tent [3] * Stale reviews (time permitting) * Remove containers from Nova's mission [4] * Add tap-as-a-service repo to Neutron [5] * Add project networking-mirantis-dvs [6] * Adding networking-bgp as a part of neutron governance project. [7] * Add networking-generic-switch under Neutron [8] * [WIP] Update Neutron repo list to reflect team split. [9] * Split out the amended stackforge resolution [10] * Open discussion [1] https://review.openstack.org/277918 [2] https://review.openstack.org/279999 [3] https://review.openstack.org/276417 [4] https://review.openstack.org/256440 [5] https://review.openstack.org/229869 [6] https://review.openstack.org/266452 [7] https://review.openstack.org/268727 [8] https://review.openstack.org/269713 [9] https://review.openstack.org/275936 [10] https://review.openstack.org/269862 It would be great if we could come to a conclusion on the Tacker review. It's still missing votes from 6 TC members... I summarized on the review the 3 objections that have been raised. They all seem to hinge on whether we trust Tacker can become a generally-useful OpenStack glue service rather than an NFV-infeodated purpose-built narrow application. Personally I'm still slightly leaning towards "initially trusting" right now, but I'll readily admit I don't know the project team well-enough to predict how they will evolve accurately. See you all tomorrow ! -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)