[openstack-tc] Thread on deferring new project proposals
Russell Bryant
rbryant at redhat.com
Tue Mar 10 19:05:07 UTC 2015
On 03/10/2015 02:28 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote:
>> Part of selling the big-tent concept was that we'd have an even *better*
>> way of communicating all of the important information consumers need
>> about projects. We haven't done that yet. We've gotten rid of what we
>> did have but haven't finished building that new system. I'm opposed to
>> approving projects until we finish putting that system in place.
>
> The "system" will never be "finished", though. Tags will always be added
> and refined. So when will it be finished enough ? I actually asked that
> question on the other thread, we should argue there instead of here.
Yep, it's hard to define "finished". I tried to make a case for it
being at least more than 0 tags. If there's no support for that, so be it.
>> Please don't just dismiss the discussion out-right ...
>
> I'm not dismissing it, just worried it will end up as yet another
> gigantic thread which only represents a vocal minority...
>
> But let's see where it goes.
>
--
Russell Bryant
More information about the OpenStack-TC
mailing list