Open Stack

Agree with everything Doug says below. Let's hold the meeting and get 
stuff done where we can.

Best,
-jay

On 03/05/2015 08:50 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi TC members,
>>
>> Here is the docket of changes proposed with enough advance time to be
>> included in the next TC meeting agenda:
>>
>> * Add IRC channel policies [1]
>> * Magnum - OpenStack Containers Service [2]
>> * Definition of the release:* tags [3]
>> * Other governance changes
>>   * Add the new developer-reference repo to the TC list [4]
>>   * Remove py26 from PTI [5]
>>   * Remove reference to Jenkins in PTI [6]
>> * Housekeeping
>>   * Add .pyc files to gitignore [7]
>>   * Update the Infrastructure project homepage URL [8]
>>   * Publish the extra ATCs for projects [9]
>> * Open discussion
>>
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/159930
>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/161080
>> [3] https://review.openstack.org/157322
>> [4] https://review.openstack.org/161009
>> [5] https://review.openstack.org/159936
>> [6] https://review.openstack.org/159935
>> [7] https://review.openstack.org/161023
>> [8] https://review.openstack.org/158371
>> [9] https://review.openstack.org/161465
>>
>> So there is definitely enough matter to hold a meeting if quorum is
>> present (7 members).
>>
>> Personally I can't commit to be there, it depends on how the Ops Summit
>> will go (as I'd like to give it priority). Jim offered to chair if the
>> meeting is not skipped. It will probably make little sense to discuss
>> the next round of release:* tags without me around to defend it, and I
>> would obviously prefer to be around when we discuss our first addition
>> of the project structure reform era (Magnum)... but I also appreciate
>> that we have no time to lose, so if there is a quorum and a chair to
>> drive it, the meeting should certainly happen.
>>
>> Thoughts, comments ?
>
> I don’t think there’s any particular rush on the release tags, so we could talk about those but defer questions to the review so you could answer them.
>
> We’ve warned projects that we’re going to take it slow bringing on more official projects, so we could start the Magnum discussion without committing to making a decision this week as well.
>
> The IRC issue seems like something we might be able to resolve this week, unless it proves more controversial than I expect.
>
> All of those items are up for review, so anyone with objections can log them in gerrit before the meeting. We can defer final votes if there is strong opposition to anything, since we know we will have a number of members absent.
>
> Anyway, if we have quorum, it seems like we should go ahead and meet and discuss the items in the order you have them listed in the proposed agenda.
>
> Doug
>
>>
>> --
>> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-TC mailing list
>> OpenStack-TC at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-tc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-TC mailing list
> OpenStack-TC at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-tc
>