Open Stack

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
wrote:

> Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > [...]
> > Rather than mark categories 2, 3 and 4 as "no-need-for-formal-vote", I'd
> > rather mark category 1 as "formal-vote". My understanding of the goal of
> > the change was to be able to separate 1 from 2/3/4 -- I think we can
> > achieve it the same that way, with less effort (less changes need formal
> > votes) and a less convoluted name.
> >
> > Let me know if that would work for you.
>
> We discussed that last meeting and I got a general go-ahead. Infra
> flipped a few bits and I just set the topic on a number of changes to
> "formal-vote":
>
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/governance+branch:master+topic:formal-vote,n,z
>
> The other changes follow one of the other approval procedures and won't
> be discussed at the meeting unless there are explicitly added to the
> agenda by one of the TC members.
>
>
So very excellent, thanks.

Anne


> Cheers,
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-TC mailing list
> OpenStack-TC at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-tc
>



-- 
Anne Gentle
Rackspace
Principal Engineer
www.justwriteclick.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/attachments/20150821/f430a81a/attachment.html>