Open Stack

On Oct 28, 2014, at 9:09 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:

> Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Does it make sense to ask for a short update on the DefCore situation? My impression is that the committee is adopting a multi-mark approach with some sort of tiering, but I haven’t had time to catch up on that. I see that on the Board meeting agenda too, though, and I’m not sure we want everyone on the board to have to sit through it twice.
> 
> This is already on the agenda proposed by the board (as well as a quick
> presentation on the need for structural reform in the ways we handle
> projects in OpenStack).

My curiosity is piqued about the second item.

> 
>> Are there any updates on the CLA issue to talk about?
> 
> The main issue with this is how quickly it can fill all the available
> time we have. If there are enough TC members interested in having that
> discussion, we can place it toward the end of the joint session so that
> it doesn't block other items and we can continue pushing for it over dinner.

Sounds good.

> 
> Jay Pipes wrote:
>> I'd like to have a discussion with the board about ways in which the process by which we check for name/copyright issues for new projects can be streamlined. 
> 
> I think that's a great idea. If we can get agreement from the board that
> preventive searches should be kept to a minimum and we should just react
> if challenged, that would be a great step forward.
> 
> Personally I'd like to suggest two themes:
> 
> - how much OpenStack (in general) should embrace Containers/Docker
> - an update on the proposed bylaws change

+1 for all 3 of those. There are actually several different bylaws changes, right?

> 
> -- 
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-TC mailing list
> OpenStack-TC at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-tc