Open Stack

On 11/25/2014 08:25 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On 11/24/2014 06:37 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>>> I was thinking about this, and I think that we should do a spec for
>>> the proposed changes in our shiny new spec repo when we've finished
>>> the discussion round. That will force us to publicly document things
>>> like the problem we think we're solving, which is important for
>>> explaining any changes we make to ATCs.
>>
>> I think that's a good idea.  Documenting the problem and proposed
>> solution in a bit more free text would be a great step to take before
>> doing the modifications to the charter to implement it since the
>> governance repo changes don't really capture the "why" as well.
> 
> Agreed. Having that intermediary step between wild brainstorming and
> precise implementation as governance changes will let us explain the
> rationale and consequences for existing projects in more detail. Not
> exactly what we created openstack-specs for but I guess we can host it
> there :)
> 
> I can work on a spec draft once I feel we have something solid to
> propose. Hopefully by the end of the week, so that we can discuss it at
> next week meeting.
> 

I guess it could be a resolution in the governance repo that declares
the intent to formalize a reform.  It doesn't really matter to me,
though ...

-- 
Russell Bryant