[openstack-tc] Designated Sections Clarification from last meeting

Rob_Hirschfeld at Dell.com Rob_Hirschfeld at Dell.com
Thu Aug 7 03:33:47 UTC 2014


Russell,

Thanks.  I reviewed that summary before I made my report to the board.

I'm glad to see that everyone is aligned.

Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbryant at redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 11:08 AM
> To: Hirschfeld, Rob; openstack-tc at lists.openstack.org
> Cc: joshua at pistoncloud.com
> Subject: Re: [openstack-tc] Designated Sections Clarification from
> last meeting
>
> On 08/06/2014 11:20 AM, Rob_Hirschfeld at Dell.com wrote:
> > I'd like to clarify my question at the tail of yesterday's meeting
> > and make sure that DefCore understands the TC's intent.
> >
> > My understanding was that the TC, based on Mark Mc's recommendation,
> > asked the Board to take over the definition and approval of
> > designated sections. The TC's position is that the integrated
> > release is a complete entity and it is a commercial function (aka
> > Board
> > responsibility) to decide which parts could be considered optional.
> >
> > DefCore is in the process of updating the DS principles and working
> > on a strawman for community review. I'm planning to request a
> > special DefCore/TC join meeting to get your input on that strawman.
> >
> > We also agreed that the integrated release is the maximum extent
> > that could be considered for DS and the Board cannot require
> > components outside of that.
> >
> > Please let me know if we misunderstood the TC's direction.
>
> I attempted to capture the TC position here:
>
> http://www.openstack.org/blog/2014/07/openstack-technical-committee-
> update-july-1/
>
> I believe your interpretation to be correct. The key points being:
>
> 1) The integrated release is the set of projects we vouch for using
> our own process and set of requirements.
>
> 2) We believe the designated sections question to be entirely the
> board's responsibility and that the TC, along with the rest of the
> community, can provide input on a proposal.
>
> See the "Designated Sections" section of the post for a more detailed
> summary of the TC position.
>
> --
> Russell Bryant
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/attachments/20140807/7cc1f04a/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-TC mailing list