Open Stack

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
> Sean Dague wrote:
>> [...]
>> So the question is: how do people feel about changing the tone of this
>> document to include the rationales baked directly into it?
>>
>> If the answer is general positive, I can take a spin on it. But want at
>> least some nod before moving forward.
>
> My gut feeling is that the document including the whys would become a
> bit too wordy, but I'm ready to be convinced, so feel free to have a
> try. If it's too wordy we could put a "why" paragraph above the
> checklist instead...

Between IRC logs, mailing list archives, and the git history on that
repository performing any sort of archaeology on the history of a
given item in the checklist can be challenging. I like the idea of
having both the "what" and "why" clearly designated somehow inline. I
will -1 any change that includes the word "whereas" though. :-)

Doug

>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-TC mailing list
> OpenStack-TC at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-tc
>