[openstack-tc] upgrade testing expectation
Thierry Carrez
thierry at openstack.org
Thu Apr 10 08:51:08 UTC 2014
Sean Dague wrote:
> I've proposed another add to the expectations post graduation to the
> governance repo - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86162/
>
> This was in the original QA requirements proposal, however when that got
> restructured, it got lost somewhere. Also happy to discuss it if there
> are any concerns.
>
> As a scorecard today the following projects participate in upgrade testing:
>
> * Nova
> * Swift
> * Keystone
> * Glance
> * Cinder
> * Horizon
> * Neutron (new as of this week)
>
> Projects that don't (yet)
> * Heat
> * Ceilometer
> * Trove
> * Sahara
Icehouse is the first release with Trove (and Juno will be the first
release with Sahara) so I think it's fine if they aren't included in
upgrade testing yet.
The fact that Ceilometer and Heat haven't caught up with upgrade testing
during their N+1 integrated cycle is more of a problem, so I think it's
a good idea to document it in the post-graduation requirements.
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/attachments/20140410/6254d6c8/attachment.pgp>
More information about the OpenStack-TC
mailing list