Open Stack

I've added some criteria, but also some questions.

Michael

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
> Hi fellow TC members,
>
> As evidenced by recent applications, it looks like we could benefit from
> having a clearer and more predictable set of requirements and criteria
> when we consider:
>
> - incubation requests
> - end-of-cycle graduation to integrated status
> - new programs
>
> This is mostly about putting words on the criteria we all unconsciously
> use when considering those applications, so that applicants can
> anticipate them (and delay their application if they feel like they
> haven't met the required bar yet).
>
> As a first step, I'd like to invite interested TC members to participate
> in drafting a MUST/SHOULD requirements list for each of those. The idea
> would be to fold Sean's QA requirements into the same set of documents.
> Criteria that are not consensual within the TC will be left out of the
> final documents (but can still be individually used in your personal
> vote). When the documents are ready we'll discuss them on -dev, and
> propose them for inclusion in the governance repo. Obviously those would
> be evolving documents as we raise the bar for inclusion even higher over
> time.
>
> Here is the set of etherpads:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/incubation-requirements
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/graduation-requirements
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/new-program-requirements
> Please follow-up there.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-TC mailing list
> OpenStack-TC at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-tc



-- 
Rackspace Australia