Open Stack

I'm guessing folks missed the email from Richard Fontana about copyright
headers being unnecessary and inaccurate when the thread moved in the
direction of copyrights on blueprints. I have resurrected the discussion
where he left off.


On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>wrote:

> Mark Washenberger wrote:
> > At some point, I would like to continue the discussion we had about
> > copyright headers. From what I saw, the resolution of legal-discuss was
> > actually that such headers are not necessary (nor indeed is explicitly
> > listing copyrights in NOTICE). I was having some problems with reply vs.
> > reply-to-list that day, so I would understand folks ending up reading it
> > the other way.
>
> I'm not convinced there is much value in discussing it at the TC meeting
> vs. continue to discuss it on the legal-discuss ML, since we get a wider
> feedback (incl. from people that are actually lawyers) from the latter.
>
> That said, I'm fine with covering it in the "open discussion" section of
> a future meeting, if you feel that's necessary. I updated the agenda
> wikipage to reflect that.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> Chair, OpenStack Technical Committee
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/attachments/20130514/28858453/attachment.html>