Open Stack

+1 from me as well.

On 10/30/2012 08:52 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> Would also appreciate a push to next week, sounds good.
> 
> Anne
> 
> On Tuesday, October 30, 2012, Russell Bryant wrote:
> 
>     On 10/30/2012 06:43 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>     > Monty Taylor wrote:
>     >> Apparently I am totally unable to perform simple timezone math,
>     so when
>     >> I offered to chair this week's meeting in ttx's absence, I was quite
>     >> incorrect.
>     >>
>     >> If you guys still want to talk about distro support policy and python
>     >> versions in my absence, that's totally cool, but I can't make it.
>     >
>     > Then I propose that we cancel the formal meeting and postpone it
>     to next
>     > week. Vish didn't start the discussion on 3rd-party APIs on the
>     > mailing-list yet so rediscussing it in meeting sounds premature. Monty
>     > won't be around to discuss his two topics.
>     >
>     > That leaves Heat motion for incubation: if someone volunteers to
>     chair I
>     > can coach him/her on the voting rules. But I think it could use
>     one more
>     > week of discussion (and I'd rather not rush the vote on that).
>     >
>     > Thoughts?
> 
>     Pushing it all to next week sounds good to me.  The Heat discussion on
>     the ML still has some movement so let's let it go another week.
> 
>     --
>     Russell Bryant
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-TC mailing list
>     OpenStack-TC at lists.openstack.org <javascript:;>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-tc
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-TC mailing list
> OpenStack-TC at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-tc
>