[Openstack-sigs] [openstack-sigs][meta] requirements process questions

Yih Leong, Sun. yihleong at gmail.com
Tue Sep 26 18:02:59 UTC 2017

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Chris Dent <cdent+os at anticdent.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-09-26 17:10:43 +0100:
>>> That sounds like a good idea. That said, one of the goals behind SIGs is
>>> that they are open to developer types as much as operator types, and
>>> therefore can be used as a vehicle to combine developer resources from
>>> like-minded organizations around a given topic.
>>> *The SIG can come up with a common priority list and have all those
>>> "internal" development resources working together in implementing those
>>> priorities. *If that's
>>> successful, there might not be as much need for external coordination
>>> and priority exposure.
This is the similar concept in Product WG when it was first established,
however, this model doesn't seems to pick up over the past two years
especially with the lack of resource/developer commitment from
organizations. I am hoping that shifting to SIG model can change the course
to drive prioritize implementation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs/attachments/20170926/8061a476/attachment.html>

More information about the openstack-sigs mailing list