Open Stack

Adam Spiers wrote:
> [...]
> That said, I'd prefer to avoid blocking progress on getting the SIG off
> the ground simply due to the lack of clear answers to these two
> questions.  Even if we don't manage to reach consensus on the name and
> scope before Sydney, hopefully it's something we could figure out in
> Sydney.  And it should be easy to rename the SIG on the wiki; presumably
> likewise with a Forum session.  The only things which would be a bit
> trickier to rename would be an IRC channel and IRC meeting, so maybe we
> should hold off on creating those at least.

Right, you should probably list the SIG as "forming" on the wiki page,
even if the name and the scope are not finalized. That gives you a
formal place to discuss the next steps :)

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)