[Openstack-sigs] [self-healing] Storyboard for tracking SIG actions?
Nematollah Bidokhti
Nematollah.Bidokhti at huawei.com
Tue Nov 28 21:11:41 UTC 2017
Once we have some more discussions on self-healing, it would be a good idea to put together an architecture framework and then see which of the current OpenStack projects can fill in the gaps. Also, I hope the discussions results in a set of requirements that can be communicated to all projects and determine what features or capabilities will help us to meet the self-healing objectives.
Nemat
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bell [mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 1:05 PM
To: openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-sigs] [self-healing] Storyboard for tracking SIG actions?
While Storyboard may not give us all we need immediately, there seemed to be a general interest to get it to a point where it could meet the communities’ needs. So, if we encounter areas for improvement, we have a chance to get those done. Sometimes, the requests for enhancement when we’re using the ‘community open source’ version of other software can be more difficult.
I’m tempted to give storyboard a go.. at minimum, we’ll get some new requirements they may like to consider for future effort which would help other SIGs following similar paths to self-healing in future.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Spiers <aspiers at suse.com>
Reply-To: "openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
Date: Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 21:43
To: "openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-sigs] [self-healing] Storyboard for tracking SIG actions?
Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>One of the benefits I would see of using Storyboard is that the
>self-healing SIG will be working with many, many OpenStack projects
>(since the main work is integrating the functionalities).
>
>As some of these will be using Storyboard (either in the short or
>long term), this would improve our chances of building up appropriate
>epics without duplicating the action items across multiple systems.
>
>Choosing the tools completely independently could risk that we end up
>having to learn all of them.
Very good point, Tim. My main hesitation with Storyboard was simply
ignorance over whether it is ready for serious use yet (and that's
despite a vague memory of Thierry answering that question recently
when I asked it ...)
But Storyboard seems to have come on hugely since I last looked at it,
so most likely my knowledge was simply out of date. If it is indeed
ready, I'm more than happy to give it a go.
That said, it seems to be based on the assumption that all work is
associated with at least one project (i.e. git repo). Is there a way
to make it work for a SIG which has no corresponding git repo?
_______________________________________________
openstack-sigs mailing list
openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs
_______________________________________________
openstack-sigs mailing list
openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs
More information about the openstack-sigs
mailing list