[Openstack-sigs] [meta] [self-healing] ANNOUNCE: Self-healing SIG officially formed
Eric K
ekcs.openstack at gmail.com
Tue Nov 28 02:29:31 UTC 2017
Many thanks, Adam, for laying the ground work for the SIG!
Looking forward to working with everyone to drive the self-healing vision
forward in OS!
On 11/27/17, 6:19 AM, "Adam Spiers" <aspiers at suse.com> wrote:
>TL;DR: the self-healing SIG is officially formed! Watch the
>openstack-sigs
>mailing list for future developments.
>
>A longer version of this announcement can be found at
>
>
>https://blog.adamspiers.org/2017/11/24/announcing-openstacks-self-healing-
>sig/
>
>
>A SIG is born!
>--------------
>
>After an unofficial kick-off meeting at the last PTG in Denver, I
>proposed the creation of a new self-healing SIG:
>
>
>http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs/2017-September/000054.
>html
>
>At the recent Summit in Sydney, we had a Forum session around 30
>people attend the Sydney Forum session, which was extremely
>encouraging! You can read more details in the etherpad, but here is
>the quick summary ...
>
>Most importantly, we resolved the naming and scoping issues,
>concluding that to avoid biting off too much in one go, it was better
>to be pragmatic and start small:
>
> - Initially focus on cloud infrastructure, and not worry too much
> about the user-facing impact of failures yet; we can add that
> concern whenever it makes sense (which is particularly relevant
> for telcos / NFV).
>
> - Not worry too much about optimization initially; Watcher is
> possibly the only project focusing on this right now, and again we
> can expand to include optimization any time we want.
>
>Now that the naming and scoping issues are resolved, I am excited to
>announce that the Self-healing SIG is officially formed!
>
>Discussion went beyond mere administravia, however:
>
> - We collected a few initial use cases.
>
> - We informally decided the governance of the SIG. I asked if anyone
> else would like to assume leadership, but noone seemed keen,
> dashing my hopes of avoiding extra work ;-) But Eric Kao, PTL of
> Congress, generously offered to act as co-chair.
>
> - We discussed health check APIs, which were mentioned in at least 2
> or 3 other Forum sessions this time round.
>
> - We agreed that we wanted an IRC channel, and that it could host
> bi-weekly meetings. However as usual there was no clean solution
> to choosing a time which would suit everyone ;-/ I'll try to
> figure out what to do about this!
>
>
>Get involved
>------------
>
>You are warmly invited to join, if this topic interests you:
>
> - Ensure you are subscribed to the openstack-sigs mailing list:
>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs
>
> and watch out watch out for posts tagged =[self-healing]=.
>
> - Bookmark https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Self_healing_SIG
> which is the SIG's official home.
>
>
>Next steps
>----------
>
>I will set up the IRC channel, and see if we can make progress on
>agreeing times for regular IRC meetings.
>
>Other than this administravia, it is of course up to the community to
>decide in which direction the SIG should go, but my suggestions are:
>
> - Continue to collect use cases. It makes sense to have a very
> lightweight process for this (at least, initially), so Eric has
> created a Google Doc and populated it with a suggested template and
> a first example:
>
>
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/13N36g2RlUYs8mw7hbfRXw6y2Jc-V2XGrXgfPXP
>pUvuU/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Feel free to add your own based on this template.
>
> - Collect links to any existing documentation or other resources which
> describe how existing services can be combined. This awesome talk
> on Advanced Fault Management with Vitrage and Mistral is a perfect
> example:
>
>
>https://www.openstack.org/videos/sydney-2017/advanced-fault-management-wit
>h-vitrage-and-mistral
>
> and here is another:
>
>
>https://www.openstack.org/videos/barcelona-2016/building-self-healing-appl
>ications-with-aodh-zaqar-and-mistral
>
> but we need to make it easier for operators to understand which
> combinations like this are possible, and easier for them to be set
> up.
>
> - Finish the architecture diagram drafted in Denver:
>
>
>https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1kEFtVpQ4c8HipSp34EVAkcSGmwyg1MzWf_H5oG
>Ttl-Y/edit?usp=sharing
>
> - At a higher level, we could document reference stacks which address
> multiple self-healing cases.
>
> - Talk more with the OPNFV community to find out what capabilities
> they have which could be reused within non-NFV OpenStack clouds.
>
> - Perform gaps analysis on the use cases, and liase with specific
> projects to drive development in directions which can address those
> gaps.
>
>_______________________________________________
>openstack-sigs mailing list
>openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs
More information about the openstack-sigs
mailing list