+1! -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhillsman at gmail.com mobile: +1 (832) 264-2646 irc: mrhillsman From: Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmail.com> Reply-To: <openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org> Date: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 at 8:33 AM To: <openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [Openstack-sigs] [lts] Longer release cycles Again, this won't solve the upgrade pressure/pain (skip-level upgrades is your friend there), nor is it going to solve your LTS needs (won't make branches live for 3+ years). It's just acknowledging that OpenStack is maturing, development pace is less hectic, and our 6-months cycles might (might) put unnecessary pressure and overhead on us for limited gains. +1! _______________________________________________ openstack-sigs mailing list openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs/attachments/20171122/3c3743ce/attachment.html>