Open Stack

Happy either way but consistency would be good… if there is convergence for *-sig, it’s fine for me, self-healing-sig ?

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Leafe <ed at leafe.com>
Reply-To: "openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
Date: Friday, 1 December 2017 at 19:15
To: "openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-sigs] [self-healing] Storyboard for tracking SIG actions?

    On Dec 1, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
    
    > Using a repo name which is consistent with the mailing list tag is also nice, so something like
    > 
    > sig-self-healing
    > 
    > sig at the beginning would also set the name space cleanly for the future (e.g. sig-scientific, sig-product, …)
    
    We (the API SIG) are already using [api-sig]. To my eye, that seems like a clearer ordering.
    
    -- Ed Leafe
    
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    openstack-sigs mailing list
    openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org
    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs