Open Stack

On 05/13/2013 06:44 PM, Sam Danes wrote:
> I agree that Tempest core (or any OpenStack core) is meant to and should 
> be a fluid thing where members drop in and out based on activity.
> 
> That having been said, I also agree with what Attila said in that people 
> that are totally inactive, certainly should be dropped. Beyond that 
> there should be an agreed metric for how someone is added or dropped and 
> when it is changed.
> 
> A question for the group too. There seem to be several Quality related 
> groups out there for OpenStack. There is OpenStack QA, OpenStack QA 
> Core, Tempest Drivers and tempest-core. I assume OpenStack QA is the 
> general QA related group. tempest-core is the Gerrit group that is 
> configured as core review from openstack-infra (and I presume membership 
> in this group is what is being discussed).
> 
> What then are OpenStack QA Core and Tempest Drivers? I apologize if I'm 
> missing something obvious there.

The Tempest Drivers team has management abilities on blueprints
(approval and targeting). The OpenStack QA core team I *think* is
actually the team that we're talking about here... it's the team that
gets +2 rights on reviews. The tempest-core team I believe should be
removed?

Best,
-jay