Open Stack

+1 .

I agree with Attila. 

I would also like dwalleck and mordred continue to be openstack-qa-core members.

Regards,

Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Attila Fazekas [mailto:afazekas at redhat.com] 
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 1:24 PM
To: All Things QA.
Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Tempest core cleanup

It is a big sudden change in our process.
I have no objection against removing the completely inactive members.

'dwalleck' has more reviews than the average and attending the QA meetings.
'mordred' has commits from the past 90 days.

I would preserve their membership for now.
We can discuss more stricter criteria for future usage.


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sean Dague" <sean at dague.net>
> To: openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 1:34:25 AM
> Subject: [openstack-qa] Tempest core cleanup
> 
> I was asked today about some possible tempest core adds, and using
> russell's handy review-o-metric generator here is what the last 90 days
> look like:
> 
> +----------------------+-----------------------------------+
> |       Reviewer       | Reviews (-2|-1|+1|+2) (+/- ratio) |
> +----------------------+-----------------------------------+
> |      sdague **       |      171 (4|56|0|111) (64.9%)     |
> |      cyeoh-0 **      |      162 (0|52|15|95) (67.9%)     |
> |     afazekas **      |      107 (1|18|25|63) (82.2%)     |
> |    david-kranz **    |       93 (0|14|6|73) (84.9%)      |
> |     treinish **      |       83 (1|35|2|45) (56.6%)      |
> |     jaypipes **      |       56 (0|12|2|42) (78.6%)      |
> |       ivan-zhu       |       35 (0|8|27|0) (77.1%)       |
> |   andrea-frittoli    |       23 (0|1|22|0) (95.7%)       |
> |         jogo         |       20 (0|4|16|0) (80.0%)       |
> |      donald-ngo      |       18 (0|5|13|0) (72.2%)       |
> | ravikumar-venkatesan |       15 (0|1|14|0) (93.3%)       |
> |     dwalleck **      |        13 (0|4|5|4) (69.2%)       |
> |       adalbas        |       13 (0|1|12|0) (92.3%)       |
> |       psedlak        |        11 (0|2|9|0) (81.8%)       |
> |        lauria        |       11 (0|0|11|0) (100.0%)      |
> |       prekarat       |        10 (0|4|6|0) (60.0%)       |
> |       gfidente       |       10 (0|0|10|0) (100.0%)      |
> |        igawa         |        6 (0|0|6|0) (100.0%)       |
> |       maurosr        |        5 (0|0|5|0) (100.0%)       |
> |        fungi         |        5 (0|0|5|0) (100.0%)       |
> |     rohitkarajgi     |        4 (0|1|3|0) (75.0%)        |
> |       dachary        |        3 (0|2|1|0) (33.3%)        |
> |         maru         |        3 (0|1|2|0) (66.7%)        |
> |    jerome-gallard    |        3 (0|0|3|0) (100.0%)       |
> |        ayoung        |        2 (0|1|1|0) (50.0%)        |
> |       unknown        |        2 (0|0|2|0) (100.0%)       |
> |     johngarbutt      |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> |    doug-hellmann     |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> |       cboylan        |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> |  armando-migliaccio  |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> |        akuno         |         1 (0|1|0|0) (0.0%)        |
> |        ymzk37        |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> |        tmello        |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> |       mriedem        |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> |       mpavlase       |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> |       mkollaro       |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> |        heckj         |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> |       dperaza        |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> |       bob-ball       |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> |        aloga         |        1 (0|0|1|0) (100.0%)       |
> +----------------------+-----------------------------------+
> 
> There remains a pretty distinct line between the 6 core members at the
> top, and the rest of the pack, so now doesn't feel like the right time
> to add more folks. However, I'd really like to see more folks actively
> participating in reviews.
> 
> It also turns out our core count isn't 6, it's 12, and with only 1/2 the
> core members being active at this point, I'd like to clean up the group
> a little. I think historically we've been in an add only mode, but it's
> important to realize this isn't an honor society, but it's a working
> role. And if folks aren't actively reviewing a lot of code it's better
> to remove them from the list. People can come back later if they start
> getting active in the community again through normal nomination process:
> 
> So I suggest we remove the following people from openstack-qa-core to
> have the group more reflective of those doing the core reviewing:
> 
>          "blamar",
>          "bcwaldon",
>          "dwalleck",
>          "westmaas",
>          "corvus",
>          "mordred",
> 
> 
> 	-Sean
> 
> --
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-qa mailing list
> openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa
> 

_______________________________________________
openstack-qa mailing list
openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa