[openstack-qa] Tempest directory restructure proposal

Kashyap Chamarthy kchamart at redhat.com
Tue May 7 19:44:55 UTC 2013


On 05/08/2013 01:03 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> As a follow up to our session on Tempest Best Practices at the summit, I'm beginning down
> the path of the restructure of the Tempest repository, trying to go with a "get a README
> approved first, then do" approach.
> 
> So here is the first review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/28453/
> 
> Please provide your feedback, either in the review, or here on list. And once that is
> approved and in, I'll go forward with doing some incremental changes. My theory on order is:
> 
> cli
> scenario
> stress
> 3rdparty

Can you please elaborate what did you have in mind here? 3rd party 'companies' ?

> api

performance (?)
	- Doesn't have to be full featured. Some minimal set which might give a rough view
whether its improving/degrading.

I wonder what others here think. Whether its too much or out of scope (due to time
constraints or other factors I haven't taken into account here).


Thanks

-- 
/kashyap



More information about the openstack-qa mailing list