History of the Active VM creation performance. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1016633 <open> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1100446 <fixed> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Yeoh" <cyeoh at au1.ibm.com> To: openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 9:12:50 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Priolity brainstorming my initial toughts On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:13:24 -0400 Matthew Treinish <mtreinish at kortar.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:12:11PM +0200, Giulio Fidente wrote: > > On 06/14/2013 10:33 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote: > > >- Gate time is continuously increasing and it will > > > if we do not act soon. > > > > It's an interesting topic but I need a little wrap on on the > > situation. Still, it'll hopefully be useful to other people also > > willing to contribute. > > > > What are the blockers currently preventing us from using testr and > > "drop" nose? > > So testr will technically run today, (to test it use 'testr run' or > in parallel 'testr run --parallel') but you'll find that it is slower > than just running serially with nose. What sort of machine are you finding that running in parallel runs slower than run serially with nose? A few months ago I was seeing a 2x speed up on 4 core machine when running with testr in parallel compared to running with nose serially. Chris -- cyeoh at au1.ibm.com _______________________________________________ openstack-qa mailing list openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa