[openstack-qa] Priolity brainstorming my initial toughts

Attila Fazekas afazekas at redhat.com
Sun Jun 16 08:40:19 UTC 2013

History of the Active VM creation performance.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1016633 <open>

https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1100446 <fixed>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Yeoh" <cyeoh at au1.ibm.com>
To: openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 9:12:50 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Priolity brainstorming my initial toughts

On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:13:24 -0400
Matthew Treinish <mtreinish at kortar.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:12:11PM +0200, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> > On 06/14/2013 10:33 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
> > >- Gate time is continuously increasing and it will
> > >   if we do not act soon.
> > 
> > It's an interesting topic but I need a little wrap on on the
> > situation. Still, it'll hopefully be useful to other people also
> > willing to contribute.
> > 
> > What are the blockers currently preventing us from using testr and
> > "drop" nose?
> So testr will technically run today, (to test it use 'testr run' or
> in parallel 'testr run --parallel') but you'll find that it is slower
> than just running serially with nose. 

What sort of machine are you finding that running in parallel runs
slower than run serially with nose? A few months ago I was seeing a 2x
speed up on 4 core machine when running with testr in parallel compared
to running with nose serially.

cyeoh at au1.ibm.com

openstack-qa mailing list
openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org

More information about the openstack-qa mailing list