[openstack-qa] Is tempest must be able to operate without identity admin privileges?
Attila Fazekas
afazekas at redhat.com
Sun Jun 9 07:26:20 UTC 2013
Looks like everybody is able to change the quota at the same time, when he creates the test user.
It implies the question:
Why do we create new tenants in test case,
which must be able to run in parallel with a single tenant ?
Why we not just create tenants only when it is really needed ?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jay Pipes" <jaypipes at gmail.com>
> To: openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2013 12:17:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Is tempest must be able to operate without identity admin privileges?
>
> On 06/08/2013 02:05 PM, Daryl Walleck wrote:
> > There's other ways to work around the quotas issue. The way I've been
> > handling this is configuring users that have modified quota groups. This
> > has allowed me to run all my compute tests in parallel with a single user.
>
> Note that the above solution runs into the exact same issue that Attila
> is talking about: you need admin privileges in order to change the quota
> of a tenant.
>
> Best,
> -jay
>
> > Daryl
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Attila Fazekas [mailto:afazekas at redhat.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2013 8:04 AM
> > To: Sean Dague
> > Cc: All Things QA.
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Is tempest must be able to operate without
> > identity admin privileges?
> >
> > Do we want parallel execution in this cases ?
> > - obviously yes
> > - nice to have
> > - who cares
> >
> > Can we expect larger quota than the default 10 in this case ?
> > - never
> > - usually
> > - always
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Sean Dague" <sean at dague.net>
> >> To: "All Things QA." <openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org>
> >> Cc: "Attila Fazekas" <afazekas at redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2013 1:49:40 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Is tempest must be able to operate without
> >> identity admin privileges?
> >>
> >> On 06/08/2013 03:06 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> In modeling viewpoint keeping the ability to run tempest without
> >>> identity admin credentials is not easy.
> >>>
> >>> The demo and alt_demo user is still in the config to maintain the
> >>> ability, to run tempest against a cloud where you do not know the
> >>> identity admin credentials.
> >>>
> >>> I would like to know, is it real use case for anyone ?
> >>>
> >>> Without these users you lose the ability to run tempest against any
> >>> cloud where you do not know the admin credentials.
> >>>
> >>> The benefits of removing these can give you:
> >>> - simpler model
> >>> - better role based test suite
> >>
> >> Yes, it is a real use case, we can't remove that.
> >>
> >> -Sean
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sean Dague
> >> http://dague.net
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openstack-qa mailing list
> > openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openstack-qa mailing list
> > openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-qa mailing list
> openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa
>
More information about the openstack-qa
mailing list