[openstack-qa] Is tempest must be able to operate without identity admin privileges?
daryl.walleck at RACKSPACE.COM
Sat Jun 8 18:05:08 UTC 2013
There's other ways to work around the quotas issue. The way I've been handling this is configuring users that have modified quota groups. This has allowed me to run all my compute tests in parallel with a single user.
From: Attila Fazekas [mailto:afazekas at redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2013 8:04 AM
To: Sean Dague
Cc: All Things QA.
Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Is tempest must be able to operate without identity admin privileges?
Do we want parallel execution in this cases ?
- obviously yes
- nice to have
- who cares
Can we expect larger quota than the default 10 in this case ?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sean Dague" <sean at dague.net>
> To: "All Things QA." <openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org>
> Cc: "Attila Fazekas" <afazekas at redhat.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2013 1:49:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Is tempest must be able to operate without identity admin privileges?
> On 06/08/2013 03:06 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > In modeling viewpoint keeping the ability to run tempest without
> > identity admin credentials is not easy.
> > The demo and alt_demo user is still in the config to maintain the
> > ability, to run tempest against a cloud where you do not know the
> > identity admin credentials.
> > I would like to know, is it real use case for anyone ?
> > Without these users you lose the ability to run tempest against any
> > cloud where you do not know the admin credentials.
> > The benefits of removing these can give you:
> > - simpler model
> > - better role based test suite
> Yes, it is a real use case, we can't remove that.
> Sean Dague
openstack-qa mailing list
openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
More information about the openstack-qa