Open Stack

Ok, with no other nominations (and plenty of +1s on this thread), we 
closed out the nomination process, and I'm now offically the new QA PTL 
for Havana.

Thanks for vote of confidence folks, I'll try not to let you all down. :)

On 07/11/2013 12:49 PM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
> +1 for Sean
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sean Dague" <sean at dague.net>
> To: "All Things QA." <openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 1:49:14 PM
> Subject: [openstack-qa] PTL Nomination / Process - throwing my hat in the	ring
>
> Now that QA is an official OpenStack Program we need both a PTL and
> Program description. My previous suggestion is we handle the PTL part
> first. That seemed to be generally agreed upon, with the process being
> that qa-core members are the voters for this.
>
> So I suggest that we open up the PTL process with nominations, with the
> hopes of getting all nominations by Thursday's QA meeting. If there are
> multiple nominations we'll organize a vote. If not it will just be
> consensus based.
>
> I think most folks are around this week, so hopefully this is fine.
> Realize what we are voting on is the QA PTL for Havana, we'll be doing
> this again at every release boundary so again in Oct for Icehouse, April
> for J, etc, etc.
>
> ....
>
> And with that, I'd like to nominate myself for QA PTL for Havana. Over
> the past couple of cycles I've been focused on the QA team process, to
> get us tracking towards a release a little bit better, restructuring
> tempest so that it's clearer from a contribution perspective, and lots
> of reviews. I've also done a lot of work on non Tempest QA efforts like
> Grenade and the Devstack gate, the rechecks page
> (http://status.openstack.org/rechecks/).
>
> I'm currently focused on new tooling to make it easier to find and
> correlate errors in the OpenStack gate, as well as be able to get us to
> a point of enforcing that we don't have stack traces in successful runs.
>
> 	-Sean
>


-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net