Open Stack

Doesn't the definition of standards come from the Technical Committee 
and the Board?

On 13-07-10 01:26 PM, Patel, Nayna (Cloud Services) wrote:
> I like to revise this Mission Statement as is doesn't talk about improving quality?
> +1 Jay...
>
> Suggestion:
>
> Define and uphold the high quality standards for developing and executing tests in a Continuous Integration release cycles of Openstack and improving the test automation toolsets.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Turner [mailto:jkt at redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:03 AM
> To: All Things QA.
> Subject: Re: [openstack-qa] Draft QA mission statement
>
> On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 09:24 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
>> Official Title: OpenStack Quality Assurance
>> PTL: TBD
>> Mission Statement: Develop and maintain tools to ensure the upstream
>> stability and quality of OpenStack, and it's release readiness at any
>> point during the cycle.
>>
>> Trying to not get too far behind the other programs, here's a draft
>> mission statement. Word smithing would be appreciated.
> Maybe I'm being too pedantic, but the statement above is focused entirely on the development and maintenance of tools and says nothing about the execution of these tools, thus implying another group will take that responsibility.  I do not believe that to be the case :-)
>
> "Develop, maintain, and initiate tools and plans to ensure the upstream stability and quality of OpenStack, and its release readiness at any point during the cycle."
>
> - jkt
>
> --
> --*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
> Jay Turner, Director, Quality Engineering    jkt at redhat.com    Red Hat, Inc.
>
>          "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human
>          stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-qa mailing list
> openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa
>