Open Stack

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Matt Riedemann <mriedemos at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I know you're just one case, but I don't know how many people are really
> running the CachingScheduler with ironic either, so it might be rare. It
> would be nice to get other operator input here, like I'm guessing CERN has
> their cells carved up so that certain cells are only serving baremetal
> requests while other cells are only VMs?

I found FilterScheduler to be near impossible to use with Ironic due
to the huge number of hypervisors it had to handle.
Using CachingScheduler made a huge difference, like day and night.

> FWIW, I think we can also backport the data migration CLI to stable branches
> once we have it available so you can do your migration in let's say Queens
> before getting to Rocky.

--
Mathieu