Open Stack

Whether there is a physical PTG session or not, I'd certainly like to meet
up with other folks who are using and/or contributing to Kolla, let's be
sure to make time for that.
Mark

On 17 August 2018 at 12:54, Adam Harwell <flux.adam at gmail.com> wrote:

> As one of the other two in the etherpad, I will say that I was looking
> forward to getting together face to face with other contributors for the
> first time (as I am new to the project), but I guess the majority won't
> actually be there, and I understand that we need to do what is best for the
> majority as well.
> I know that at least one or maybe two other people from my team were also
> planning to attend some Kolla sessions, so I'll see if I can get them to
> sign up.
> The other projects I'll be focused on are Octavia and Barbican, and I know
> both have been successful with a hybrid approach in the past (providing
> video of the room and allowing folks to dial in and contribute, while also
> having a number of people present physically).
> Since the room is already reserved, I don't see a huge point in avoiding
> its use either.
>
>    --Adam
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 20:27 Mark Goddard <mark at stackhpc.com> wrote:
>
>> As one of the lucky three kolleagues able to make the PTG, here's my
>> position (inline).
>>
>> On 17 August 2018 at 11:52, Eduardo Gonzalez <dabarren at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Fellow kolleages.
>>>
>>> In september is Denver PTG, as per the etherpad [0] only 3 contributors
>>> confirmed their presence in the PTG, we expected more people to be there as
>>> previous PTGs were full of contributors and operators.
>>>
>>> In the last kolla meeting [1] with discussed if we should make a virtual
>>> PTG rather than a on-site one as we will probably reach a bigger number of
>>> attendance.
>>>
>>> This set us in a bad possition as per:
>>>
>>> If we do an on-site PTG
>>>
>>> - Small representation for a whole cycle design, being this one larger
>>> than usual.
>>> - Many people whiling to attend is not able to be there.
>>>
>>
>> I agree that three is too small a number to justify an on-site PTG. I was
>> planning to split my time between kolla and ironic, so being able to focus
>> on one project would be beneficial to me, assuming the virtual PTG takes
>> place at a different time. I could still split my time if the virtual PTG
>> occurs at the same time.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> If we do a virtual PTG
>>>
>>> - Some people already spend money to travel for kolla PTG
>>>
>>
>> I would be going anyway.
>>
>>
>>> - PTG rooms are already reserved for kolla session
>>>
>>
>> If the virtual PTG occurs at the same time, we could use the (oversized)
>> reserved room to dial into calls.
>>
>> - No cross project discussion
>>>
>>
>> Happy to attend on behalf of kolla and feed back to the team.
>>
>>>
>>> If there are more people who is going to Denver and haven't signed up at
>>> the etherpad, please confirm your presence as it will probably influence on
>>> this topic.
>>>
>>> Here is the though question...
>>>
>>> What kind of PTG do you prefer for this one, virtual or on-site in
>>> Denver?
>>>
>>
>> Virtual makes sense to me.
>>
>>>
>>> CC to Kendall Nelson from the foundation if she could help us on this
>>> though decission, given the small time we have until the PTG both ways have
>>> some kind of bad consecuencies for both the project and the contributors.
>>>
>>> [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-stein-ptg-planning
>>> [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/kolla/2018/kolla.
>>> 2018-08-15-15.00.log.html#l-13
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> ______________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:
>>> unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:
>> unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20180817/c421150d/attachment.html>