Open Stack

Sending again, I don't think it went to openstack-operators at .

--ruby

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Loo, Ruby <ruby.loo at intel.com> wrote:

> Hello ironic'ers,
>
>
>
> A while ago, we approved a spec to add node tag support to ironic [1]. The
> feature itself did not land yet (although some of the code has). Now that
> the (nova) community has come up with traits, ironic wants to support node
> traits, and there is a spec proposing that [2]. At the ironic node level,
> this is VERY similar to the node tag support, so the thought is to drop
> (not implement) the node tagging feature, since the node traits feature
> could be used instead. There are a few differences between the tags and
> traits. "Traits" means something in OpenStack, and there are some
> restrictions about it:
>
> - max 50 per node
>
> - names must be one of those in os-traits library OR prefixed with
> 'CUSTOM_'
>
>
>
> For folks that wanted the node tagging feature, will this new node traits
> feature work for your use case? Should we support both tags and traits? I
> was wondering about e.g. using ironic standalone.
>
>
>
> Please feel free to comment in [2].
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> --ruby
>
>
>
> [1] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/
> approved/nodes-tagging.html
>
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/504531/
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20171025/b6bace97/attachment.html>