Open Stack

Jon,

I think the Foundation staff were very very wary of extending the PTG or
doing dual sites simultaneously due to not saving a thing logistically.
Yes, it would conceivably save travel for folks that need to go to two
separate events (as would the other colo options on the table) but not
saving a thing logistically over two separate events as we have now. A six
or seven day sprint/thing/ptg would also mean encroaching on one or both
weekends (above and beyond travel dates) and that may really limit venue
choices as private parties (weddings, etc) tend to book those locales on
weekends.

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Jonathan Proulx <jon at csail.mit.edu> wrote:

> :On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Chris Morgan <mihalis68 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> :> The big topic of debate, however, was whether subsequent meetups should
> be
> :> co-located with OpenStack PTG. This is a question for the wider
> OpenStack
> :> operators community.
>
> For people who attend both I thnik this would be a big win, if they
> were in the same location (city anyway) but held in series.  One
> (longer) trip but no scheduling conflict.
>
> Downside I see is that makes scheduling constraints pretty tight
> either for having two sponsorslocation available in a coordinated time
> and place or making a much bigger ask of a single location.
>
> Those are my thoughts, not sure if the amount to an opinion.
>
> -Jon
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20171121/90033ecf/attachment.html>