Thanks I guess you meant "nova db with cell0 appended" and not "nova_api db with cell0 appended" as you wrote My use case is that I share the same percona cluster to host the databases of multiple openstack installations. So if it is <nova-database-name>-cell0 this is fine. If instead it is hard-coded to nova-cell0, we have a problem Thanks again, Massimo 2017-05-26 17:04 GMT+02:00 Mike Lowe <jomlowe at iu.edu>: > The whole cell thing tripped me up earlier this week. From what I > understand it’s hard coded in the upgrade scripts to be the same as the > nova_api db with cell0 appended to the db name but there is a patch in to > change this behavior to match what the install docs say. So it looks like > if you just put the nova_cell0 db on the same host and make the credentials > match your nova db everything will just work out. You can double check by > looking at the cell_mapping table entries in your nova_api db. > > > On May 26, 2017, at 10:56 AM, Massimo Sgaravatto < > massimo.sgaravatto at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > I am reading the RDO installation guide for Ocata. In the nova section [*] > it is explained how to create the nova_cell0 database, but I can't find how > to set the relevant connection string in the nova configuration file. > Any hints ? > Thanks, Massimo > > > [*] > https://docs.openstack.org/ocata/install-guide-rdo/nova- > controller-install.html > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20170526/c7e2b28b/attachment.html>