[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] Who needs multiple api_servers?
Nikhil Komawar
nik.komawar at gmail.com
Mon May 1 18:21:40 UTC 2017
I agree.
I think the solution proposed earlier in this thread about making default
to service catalog and optionally allow ops to choose 'the list of
glance-apis to send data to', would make everyone's life easier.
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Blair Bethwaite <blair.bethwaite at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 28 April 2017 at 21:17, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:
> > On 04/28/2017 12:50 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
> >> We at Nectar are in the same boat as Mike. Our use-case is a little
> >> bit more about geo-distributed operations though - our Cells are in
> >> different States around the country, so the local glance-apis are
> >> particularly important for caching popular images close to the
> >> nova-computes. We consider these glance-apis as part of the underlying
> >> cloud infra rather than user-facing, so I think we'd prefer not to see
> >> them in the service-catalog returned to users either... is there going
> >> to be a (standard) way to hide them?
> >
> > In a situation like this, where Cells are geographically bounded, is
> > there also a Region for that Cell/Glance?
>
> Hi Sean. Nope, just the one global region and set of user-facing APIs.
> Those other glance-apis are internal architectural details and should
> be hidden from the public catalog so as not to confuse users and/or
> over-expose information.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Cheers,
> ~Blairo
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20170501/ce68aca8/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list