Open Stack

I remember there was a discussion about having a session for all UC Working
Group to meet together for collaboration and sharing works. Would this be a
session submitted by UC?

Also there was a previous discussion about improving the OpenStack Summit
session/track selection process in the track-chair mail list. Wondering if
that should be included in Forum?




On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Shamail Tahir <itzshamail at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Welcome to the topic selection process for our first Forum in Boston. If
> you've participated in an ops meetup before, this should seem pretty
> comfortable. If not, note that this is *not* a classic conference track
> with speakers and presentations. OpenStack community members (participants
> in development teams, working groups, and other interested individuals)
> discuss the topics they want to cover and get alignment on and we welcome
> your participation.
>
> The Forum is for the entire community to come together; create a neutral
> space rather than having separate “ops” and “dev” days. Boston marks the
> start of the Queen's release cycle, where ideas and requirements will be
> gathered. Users should aim to come armed with feedback from February's
> Ocata release if at all possible. We aim to ensure the broadest coverage of
> topics that will allow for multiple parts of the community getting together
> to discuss key areas within our community/projects.
>
> Examples of the types of discussions and some sessions that might fit
> within each one:
>
>    - *Strategic, whole-of-community discussions*, to think about the big
>    picture, including beyond just one release cycle and new technologies
>
>
>    - eg *Making OpenStack One Platform for containers/VMs/Bare Metal* (Strategic
>    session) the entire community congregates to share opinions on how to make
>    OpenStack achieve its integration engine goal
>
>
>    - *Cross-project sessions*, in a similar vein to what has happened at
>    past design summits, but with increased emphasis on issues that are
>    relevant to all areas of the community
>
>
>    - eg *Rolling Upgrades at Scale* (Cross-Project session) – the Large
>    Deployments Team collaborates with Nova, Cinder and Keystone to tackle
>    issues that come up with rolling upgrades when there’s a large number of
>    machines.
>
>
>    - *Project-specific sessions*, where developers can ask users specific
>    questions about their experience, users can provide feedback from the last
>    release and cross-community collaboration on the priorities, and ‘blue sky’
>    ideas for the next release.
>
>
>    - *eg Neutron Pain* *Points* (Project-Specific session) – Co-organized
>    by neutron developers and users. Neutron developers bring some specific
>    questions they want answered, Neutron users bring feedback from the latest
>    release and ideas about the future.
>
>
> There are two stages to the brainstorming:
>     1. Starting today, set up an etherpad with your group/team, or use one
> on the list and start discussing ideas you'd like to talk about at the
> Forum. Then, through +1s on etherpads and mailing list discussion, work out
> which ones are the most needed - just like you did prior to the ops
> events.
>     2. Then, in a couple of weeks, we will open up a more formal web-based
> tool for submission of abstracts that came out of the brainstorming on top.
>
> We expect working groups may make their own etherpads, however the User
> Committee offers a catch-all to get the widest feedback possible:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-UC-brainstorming
>
> Feel free to use that, or make one for your group and add it to the list
> at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Boston2017
>
> Thanks,
> User Committee <https://www.openstack.org/foundation/user-committee/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20170301/5a9c19cb/attachment.html>