Open Stack

David Medberry wrote:
> Just saw some of your comments (great, thanks), and I'll weigh in if I
> come up with a cogent input.
> 
> I'd really like to see Bloomberg, RAX, and Cirrus7, Huawei, and other
> ops folks respond.
> 
> I suspect this is already a fait accompli but there are many details (as
> you mentioned already in one posting about mid-cycles) to work out.

It's not really fait accompli, it's just a proposal up for discussion at
this stage. Which is the reason why I started the thread on -dev -- to
check the sanity of the change from a dev perspective first. If it makes
things harder and not simpler on that side, I don't expect the TC to
proceed.

While it may have desirable side-effects on the ops side (something I'm
not convinced of), the main reason for it is imho to align our rhythm
with our current development pace / developer capabilities. I felt like
we were self-imposing too many deadlines, events and coordination
processes for limited gain. Maybe I'm wrong though :)

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)