[Openstack-operators] [kolla] question of default users for operators
Steven Dake (stdake)
stdake at cisco.com
Thu Sep 1 06:32:04 UTC 2016
I wanted to get back to you with what we ended up with in Kolla Newton, as well as our z streams of Liberty and Mitaka.
We decided not to create a default user as a result of this thread. We did decide to create a member role to match the defaults shipped in horizon's configuration files.
Hope the information is useful.
Thanks for the tight feedback loop :)
On 7/31/16, 6:13 PM, "Blair Bethwaite" <blair.bethwaite at gmail.com> wrote:
>Sounds like a recipe for confusion?
>On 1 August 2016 at 10:23, Steven Dake (stdake) <stdake at cisco.com> wrote:
>> On 7/31/16, 7:13 AM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On 07/29/2016 11:35 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>>>> Hey folks,
>>>> In Kolla we have a significant bug in that Horizon can't be used because
>>>> it requires a member user. We have a few approaches to fixing this
>>>> problem in mind, but want to understand what Operators want. Devstack
>>>> itself has switched between member and _member_ although Devstack isn't
>>>> our reference: Operators are.
>>>> Which of those do operators prefer (if either).
>>>> Another question was whether we should create a default user named
>>>> "user" and use this in place of member.
>>>"member" is a role, not a user. The default unprivileged user is named
>>>"demo" and has the "member" role in a project called "demo".
>> Yup, thanks for the correction.
>>>Are you asking what the name of the unprivileged *role* should be by
>>>default in Kolla installations? Or are you asking what, if any, a
>>>default unprivileged *user* should be called?
>> The idea of adding a user called "user" with a role called "user" was
>> proposed. Curious if operators care to want that.
>>>OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>>OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
More information about the OpenStack-operators