[Openstack-operators] [trove][nova][octavia][manila][sahara][designate][zaqar] Projects that use service VM's (Was: More file injection woes)
amrith at tesora.com
Sun Nov 13 16:03:59 UTC 2016
That's fine, I will take care of putting it in the devref but this is the
only way in which I know to identify the "cats" involved :)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 10:29 AM
> To: Amrith Kumar <amrith at tesora.com>; OpenStack Development Mailing
> List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>;
> openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators]
> [trove][nova][octavia][manila][sahara][designate][zaqar] Projects that use
> service VM's (Was: More file injection woes)
> On 11/13/2016 9:20 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
> > Matt,
> > In Barcelona, there was a discussion amongst all projects that used
> > service VM's. I'm not able to find the actual meeting on my calendar
> > now but here's the list that I know of so far; I've tagged those
> > projects in the subject line of this top post.
> > Off the top of my head, the list includes Octavia, Manila, Sahara,
> > Designate, Zaqar, and Trove.
> > If you know of additional projects, please add to the list (and the
> > subject line).
> > Thanks,
> > -amrith
> Ugh, OK, so having 20 project names in a ML thread subject isn't ideal for
> and I'm not going to remember it, which is why I suggested that it get
> documented in the nova devref. I'm expecting someone that cares about
> communicating this, i.e. you or a delegate, to do the work of documenting
> that as I'm not going to herd those cats. I don't mean that to be
> it's just not something I'm going to pursue.
> Matt Riedemann
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4805 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the OpenStack-operators