[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [keystone][tripleo][ansible][puppet][all] changing default token format
Rochelle Grober
rochelle.grober at huawei.com
Thu Nov 3 16:04:02 UTC 2016
a blog post on the OpenStack sore might be good. superuser? there are folks reading this who can help
Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice
From:Lance Bragstad
To:OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions),openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org,
Date:2016-11-03 08:11:20
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][tripleo][ansible][puppet][all] changing default token format
I totally agree with communicating this the best we can. I'm adding the operator list to this thread to increase visibility.
If there are any other methods folks think of for getting the word out, outside of what we've already done (release notes, email threads, etc.), please let me know. I'd be happy to drive those communications.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Alex Schultz <aschultz at redhat.com<mailto:aschultz at redhat.com>> wrote:
Hey Steve,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Steve Martinelli <s.martinelli at gmail.com<mailto:s.martinelli at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thanks Alex and Emilien for the quick answer. This was brought up at the
> summit by Adam, but I don't think we have to prevent keystone from changing
> the default. TripleO and Puppet can still specify UUID as their desired
> token format; it is not deprecated or slated for removal. Agreed?
>
My email was not to tell you to stop.I was just letting you know that
your change does not affect the puppet modules because we define our
default as UUID. It was just as a heads up to others on this email
that this change should not affect anyone consuming the puppet modules
because our default is still UUID and will be even after keystone's
default changes.
Thanks,
-Alex
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Alex Schultz <aschultz at redhat.com<mailto:aschultz at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Steve,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Steve Martinelli <s.martinelli at gmail.com<mailto:s.martinelli at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> > As a heads up to some of keystone's consuming projects, we will be
>> > changing
>> > the default token format from UUID to Fernet. Many patches have merged
>> > to
>> > make this possible [1]. The last 2 that you probably want to look at are
>> > [2]
>> > and [3]. The first flips a switch in devstack to make fernet the
>> > selected
>> > token format, the second makes it default in Keystone itself.
>> >
>> > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:make-fernet-default
>> > [2] DevStack patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367052/
>> > [3] Keystone patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/345688/
>> >
>>
>> Thanks for the heads up. In puppet openstack we had already
>> anticipated this and attempted to do the same for the
>> puppet-keystone[0] module as well. Unfortunately after merging it, we
>> found that tripleo wasn't yet prepared to handle the HA implementation
>> of fernet tokens so we had to revert it[1]. This shouldn't impact
>> anyone currently consuming puppet-keystone as we define uuid as the
>> default for now. Our goal is to do something similar this cycle but
>> there needs to be some further work in the downstream consumers to
>> either define their expected default (of uuid) or support fernet key
>> generation correctly.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/389322/
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/392332/
>>
>> >
>> > __________________________________________________________________________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20161103/8bfef04b/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list